My Sports Code allow individuals to perform at their personal peak by distinguishing talents and preferences related to the intellectual, perceptual, emotional and physical ability innately to each person. My Sports Code has been brought together by great minds with the objective of taking more than 30 years’ experience in Brain Dominance Profiling, to the masses.
Our system is able to quickly identify your unique blueprint by making use of modern technological methodologies, comparing your genetic preferences and combining that, with our tried and tested formulas. The profiling gives you the information you need to understand and distinguish between your learned behavior and the strengths and talents you are born with. More so, you will also gain insight into what your unconscious stressors are and how to manage such. Thus, providing you with customized guidance and advice relating to your unique needs in order to assist you to discover yourself within a couple of minutes.
Our mission is to empower people to better understand themselves – assisting them in making better informed life choices – and to better understand other people from their own predisposition.
The dominant brain hemisphere, which dictates how you would prefer to think, handle detail, your levels of creativeness and timekeeping.
The dominant eye, which dictates how you perceive and processes visual information. A left eye dominance candidate tracks from right-to-left, doesn’t always see detail, is sensitive to negative body language and can be at risk of being taken for a ride. Whilst a right eye candidate tracks from left to right, sees detail quickly and are more objective related to the behaviour or others.
The dominant ear, which determines how you hear and
processes auditory information.
Therefore, determining whether you have a “country club Manger/Mother Theresa” ear having difficulty saying no or do you possibly have a right impatient dominant ear making you assertive and possibly often
interrupting people!
The dominant hand, which indicates how the person communicates, follow processes and hand techniques in sport. A right hand person has a structured/straight hand ideal for golf and batting, while a left hand person has an agile hand for tennis and squash.
The dominant foot, which indicates how the person
approaches problem solving and/or whether the person has a natural straight or agile foot preference in sport.
The BDP will also assist in understanding how your
behaviour will be affected in stress.
Based on the profile, you are able to understand your preferred or natural tendencies and unconscious preferences. In addition to the above, the BDP will also tell you (amongst other things) how you will relate to other people and/or behave at work. It will assist you in understanding your feelings and emotions better and thus, how you will function unconsciously in the various dimensions of occupational behaviour.
Given that the BDP asks physical questions, it means that it is free of all of the biases that traditionally affect the results of a psychometric assessment:
Importantly, the BDP will tell you how you will function under stress and what will cause you to stress. For example, will you lose your ability to take in detailed visual information (such as statistical information), or will you be slower in solving problems? Are there times when you don’t want to interact with others, etc.
Other information that can be determined from a BDP includes (inter alia):
“Mismatching” in school, work and sport environments continues today for millions of people. It is possibly the biggest single cause of school failure (for example). It is obvious that everyone has different preferences and talents. Pablo Picasso was a great painter; William Shakespeare a phenomenal writer; Lionel Messe, Tiger Woods and Naas Botha great sportsmen; Enrico Caruso a brilliant tenor; Anna Pavlova an outstanding ballet dancer and Dwayne Johnson a fine actor.
Yet many of our schools, universities, and training providers operate as if each person is identical. Even worse is that most are operating with an evaluation system that rewards only a limited number of abilities. These rewards early in life, often set the scene and separate the allegedly gifted and intelligent from those who are claimed to be less intelligent and underachievers.
“But standardised tests don’t test all abilities”.
One of the strongest warnings against labelling and “lumping together” of learners comes from Mel Levine – professor of paediatrics at the University of North Carolina Medical School.
Planet Earth, he says in his book “One Mind at a Time”, is inhabited by all kinds of people who have all kinds of minds.
The brain of each person is unique. He likens the human mind to a complex toolbox, where not everyone may become experts in using all the implements. He prefers developing a profile that identifies each child’s strength and locates those “trouble spots” where facets of a profile don’t “mesh” with some facets of schooling. Dr. Annette Lotter from Annette Lotter and Associates has done exactly that – agreeing with Dr Levine that it is much more important to identify strengths than to concentrate too much on minor weaknesses.
Dr Willis Harman President, Institute of Noetic Sciences